Qantas’ new chairman has told shareholders the airline “might well not have survived” COVID-19 if it weren’t for the efforts of former CEO Alan Joyce.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
In an opening address to the airline’s AGM, John Mullen acknowledged that 2023 was a “very difficult year” but insisted the difficulties and reputational damage are being “comprehensively addressed”.
“Let us not forget that Alan was CEO for fifteen years and in that time delivered many years of exceptional results to the benefit of shareholders and other stakeholders,” he said at the end of his speech.
“Richard [Goyder, the former chairman] and Alan steered Qantas through the dark and difficult days of COVID during which, without their leadership, Qantas might well have not survived, and we might not all be here today.”
Mullen’s backing of the controversial ex-CEO significantly comes days before an apparent expose of the airline and Joyce’s tenure is released by former columnist for The Australian Financial Review, Joe Aston.
It also follows the release of a governance review earlier this year that concluded that one cause of Qantas’ 2023 problems was Joyce’s “top-down leadership” style.
“There is no pretending that last year was anything other than a very difficult year for Qantas,” Mullen said at the gathering in Hobart.
“I will not go through the various challenges that the company experienced as they have been widely reported in the press and elsewhere.
“But what I can tell you with conviction is that firstly Qantas and Jetstar have always been and remain excellent airlines. The group’s reputation for safety and operational excellence has remained first class throughout even the most difficult of times.
“And secondly, I can assure you that the issues that caused the difficulties and reputational damage last year have been and are being comprehensively addressed.
“An important part of strengthening the foundations was understanding what went wrong.
“Last year, my predecessor Richard Goyder instigated an independent Board Governance Review. The review, led by experienced business adviser Tom Saar, has been crucial to understanding how Qantas can improve and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
“We were fully transparent as to the issues of last year and we have committed to some 32 key changes in the governance of the airline.
“While in no way shying away from the past, however it is time now to put this period behind us and to move on, to look forward to the future and to focus on the exciting opportunities that lie ahead for Qantas.”
Australian Aviation also reported in September how ex-chairman Goyder himself backed Joyce’s apparent “command and control” management style during COVID-19, despite its criticism.
Speaking after the governance report’s publication, Goyder argued a top-down approach was necessary during COVID-19 but agreed with criticism the company didn’t do enough to revert to normal when the pandemic ended.
“That [criticism] is absolutely valid,” he told The Australian Financial Review. “We had tightened up on so many things, nobody could spend a cent, it was all about liquidity. The number one rule of business: don’t run out of cash.
“As we came out, we had probably a coincidence of people who decided not to come back to Qantas, and we still had very tight controls because we needed to, because the balance sheet had been really knocked about.
“We probably didn’t give our frontline people the capacity to deal with the myriad issues which came along. Our customers, rightly, felt that we weren’t responsive enough. In hindsight, you would do it differently, but it was difficult at the time.”
[email protected]
says:AJ is/ was held in high regard by our industry leaders and the new Chair of QF is both accurate and gracious by his acknowledgement of how well AJ did during his tenure. There is a lesson for us all here in that when situations totally divorced from our primary employment role at such a high level become aligned with social and controversial comment that “things” get messy and in this regard AJ maybe should have shut it! – Remember Israel F…..? not cool AJ, and there was more too but best wishes.
[email protected]
says:I disagree strenuously wirh your comment lauding Joyce for his performance during COVID. His outsourcing of 1700 operational jobs was utterly disgusting as was supported by the subsequent court decision. Joyce was quite happy to get rid of nearly 2000 Qantas jobs, bot worse than that give these jobs to spurious overseas operators. A great man? I think not!