Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on false in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/momentummedia-article-gate/includes/class-momentummedia-article-gate.php on line 169

Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on false in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/momentummedia-article-gate/includes/class-momentummedia-article-gate.php on line 169

Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on false in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/momentummedia-article-gate/includes/class-momentummedia-article-gate.php on line 169

Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on false in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/momentummedia-article-gate/includes/class-momentummedia-article-gate.php on line 169
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
australian aviation logo

USAF excludes “late” KC-X bid

written by australianaviation.com.au | August 9, 2010


Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on false in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/momentummedia-article-gate/includes/class-momentummedia-article-gate.php on line 169

Warning: Undefined array key "image-size-770" in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310

Warning: Trying to access array offset on null in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310

Side view drawings of the An-112KC concept.

Continuing the somewhat farcical nature of the US’s ongoing attempts to replace its fleet of 45+ year old KC-135 tankers, the USAF has excluded the bid by US Aerospace for the KC-X tanker replacement program due to it being submitted to project officials five minutes after the 2.00pm, July 9 deadline.

US Aerospace says the bid, which proposes the An-112KC, a radical twin jet variant of the Antonov An-70 four engine turboprop airlifter, arrived at the gate at Wright Patterson AFB at 1.30pm on the due date, but the company claims the courier was initially asked to wait and was then given incorrect directions to the project office. When the courier finally delivered the bid, it was time stamped 2.05pm, and the USAF has since decided the bid will not be considered on this basis.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin

As a result of its exclusion, US Aerospace has appealed to the US Government Accountability Office for its bid to be re-instated, claiming the bid was “under the USAF’s control” well before the cutoff, and that USAF officials “intentionally delayed the messenger from delivering our proposal to create a pretext for refusing to consider it.” The GAO is due to rule on the appeal on November 7, two days before the winning tender is due to be announced.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said US Aerospace’s claims were “absolutely absurd,” adding that “Any professional contractor understands how hard and fast these deadlines are and go through extraordinary measures to get their proposals in on time.”

The two other bidders – Boeing with its KC-767NG and EADS North America with its A330-based KC-45 both delivered their bids on July 8.

==
==
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!
Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2025 MOMENTUMMEDIA