iscover
A Sydney woman with a disability has secured better access to assistance dogs on Qantas flights moving forward, following a Federal Court ruling.
In 2022, Rachael Fullerton was refused permission by Qantas for her assistance dog, Strike, to accompany her on a flight. Strike is trained to alleviate the effects of Fullerton’s disabilities and is recognised by the National Disability Insurance Agency as an assistance animal.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
Despite the valid reasoning for why Fullerton would need Strike to accompany her on the flight, Qantas refused her request, with the airline saying Strike could not fly without meeting its requirements for assistance animals.
These requirements went well beyond what the federal Disability Discrimination Act requires in terms of training and qualifications for assistance animals. Qantas requested that Fullerton provide extensive information, including evidence of certification through one of two specific organisations, which are inaccessible to a vast number of assistance dog teams.
With the assistance of The Justice and Equity Centre and Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, Fullerton filed a disability discrimination case in the Federal Court.
“It is unlawful disability discrimination for Australian businesses to refuse service to a person because they have an assistance animal,” said Bridie Murphy, senior associate at Maurice Blackburn Lawyers.
An important subject of this case was that Strike was already approved to travel with other airlines such as Rex Airlines and Virgin Australia, and the pair had flown Virgin together multiple times.
The case was eventually settled, with Qantas agreeing to change its application and approval process for assistance animals so other dogs like Strike can obtain approval to fly without the strenuous process Qantas previously employed.
“The changes we were able to achieve with Qantas were long overdue and will ultimately make a huge difference to the accessibility of air travel for people like myself who need to travel with an assistance dog,” Fullerton said.
“It’s inconceivable that people with disabilities are still facing so many barriers to service, but hopefully this will set a precedent for improved disability standards and better practices from many businesses moving forwards.”
“It’s been a very long process to get to this point, but the outcome has definitely proven that it’s been worth it.”
Senior solicitor from the Justice and Equity Centre, Sheetal Balakrishnan, spoke to both the resilience and persistence that Fullerton had throughout the entire process.
“Rachael has been relentless in pushing Qantas to implement a fair approval system for all assistance dogs and handlers.
“But the burden shouldn’t be on people with disability to make discrimination complaints after the fact. Cases like Rachael’s show why an aviation disability standard with proactive enforcement by an independent regulator is essential to ensure people with disability have equal access to air travel.
“People with disability should be able to expect fair and consistent treatment no matter which airline they fly with or which airport they fly to. A comprehensive and enforceable national standard can set out rights for people with disability when travelling by air and require all operators to improve accessibility, so it’s not luck of the draw,” Balakrishnan said.
Murphy believed the outcome of this case was not only a win for Fullerton but for each person with a disability who relies on an assistance dog.
“This outcome not only helps Rachael and Strike, but is a win for every person with a disability who relies on an assistance dog for independence and safety. Maurice Blackburn is proud to have represented Rachael in achieving this excellent result from a hard-fought case, but it’s regrettable this case was even necessary.
“Rachael first tried to fly with Qantas in September 2022. It’s taken her more than two years and a substantial legal fight to win the right to travel with Strike on Qantas.
“The barriers to travel for people with disability are high enough. The few airlines people have access to in Australia should not be making this worse by setting up their own rules that make the process even more complicated and inaccessible.
“While this outcome is a step in the right direction, there is still a lot to be done. This entire case could have been avoided if there were clear national standards for assistance animal accreditation and disability standards for the aviation industry in particular.”
gary cusack
says:virgin is a lot easier for this sort of thing my little toy poodle budy has travelled in the cabin many times and has had his picture taken with the flight crew and the look on fellow passengers faces when they see him on board was 1 of sheer surprise and they say oh isnt he cute