iscover
The High Court has upheld a ruling recognising standby duty as work in aviation.
In a brief judgment, Australia’s highest court rejected an appeal by Corporate Air Charter of a ruling by the Full Federal Court that standby duty counts as “work” and must therefore be included in calculations of pilots’ average weekly work hours.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
The case, Corporate Air Charter Pty Ltd & Anor versus Australian Federation of Air Pilots, concerned “the nature of work and the distinction between work and availability to work within the context of the use of standby in commercial piloting”, according to the Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) union, which had fought the appeal.
“The applicants seek special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Logan, Dowling and McDonald JJ) dismissing an appeal from a decision of the South Australian Employment Court (Deputy President Lieschke) which found that a member of the respondent was entitled to unpaid entitlements under the Air Pilots Award 2010 and the Air Pilots Award 2020,” the judges wrote in their ruling.
“An appeal would be an inappropriate vehicle to consider the questions sought to be raised concerning the nature of work and the distinction between work and availability to work.”
AFAP has hailed the decision as a “watershed moment for Australian aviation”, with no further avenues left for the company to appeal.
According to AFAP legal counsel Jared Marks, the ruling has “delivered a clear message that pilots’ professional expertise and time must receive proper recognition and compensation – setting a new standard for the industry”.
“These court decisions affirm a fundamental employment principle – that workers must be fairly compensated for all time spent in service to their employer. The courts have recognised that a pilot’s time has real value, whether in the flight deck, preparing for flight, or maintaining readiness for duty,” he said.
“These decisions uphold a fundamental workers’ right – that every employee deserves fair pay for all time spent serving their employer.
“We have consistently maintained that our members’ time and expertise hold genuine value, and the courts have now affirmed this basic principle of workplace fairness.
“These landmark cases have delivered a substantial uplift in pilot award conditions, establishing new benchmarks that will benefit pilots across the industry for years to come.”
Corporate Air Charter has been ordered to pay costs to AFAP.
