iscover
Warning: Undefined array key "image-size-770" in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310
Warning: Trying to access array offset on null in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310
Australia’s High Court has handed the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) a victory in its long-running case against a number of airlines on price fixing on certain air freight charges.
In a judgement handed down on Wednesday, the High Court unanimously dismissed two appeals from a decision of the full court of the Federal Court of Australia from Air New Zealand and PT Garuda Indonesia.
This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
- Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
- Access to the Australian Aviation app
- Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
- Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
- Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
- Daily news updates via our email bulletin
“The principal issue on appeal was whether there was a market ‘in Australia’ for the air cargo services for which the airlines competed for the purposes of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth),” the High Court said in a statement.
“The High Court held that the findings of fact made by the primary judge led to the conclusion that there was such a market.”
ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said it was a significant win for the ACCC in the long-running, highly contested air cargo cartel proceedings that concerned price fixing agreements entered into between Air New Zealand, Garuda and other international airlines between 2002 and 2006 that breached Australian competition laws.
The ACCC alleged Air New Zealand in 2009 and Garuda in 2010 colluded with other airlines on charges for fuel, security, insurance surcharges, and a customs fee, for the carriage of air freight from origin ports in Hong Kong (both airlines), Singapore (Air NZ) and Indonesia (Garuda) to destination ports in Australia.
Under the Trade Practices Act as it then stood, the ACCC was required to establish that the conduct occurred in a “market in Australia”.
The Federal Court initially found that the market for the air cargo services for which the airlines competed was not in Australia.
However the ACCC appealed to the full court of the Federal Court. And the airlines then sought leave to appeal to the High Court.
“How a market is defined, including considerations of whether conduct occurs in Australia, are critical issues to the understanding and interpretation of Australian competition law,” ACCC commissioner Court said in a statement.
“Today’s judgment sends a clear message that the ACCC is committed to pursuing cartel conduct that impacts on Australian business and consumers.
The ACCC said matters against Air New Zealand and Garuda would be “remitted to the Federal Court for a hearing as to relief, including penalty”.
The ACCC commenced court proceedings against 15 international airlines between 2008 and 2010. So far, 13 airlines have been fined a total of $98.5 million.
No |
Airline |
Date of Court Order |
Penalty |
|
1 |
Qantas |
December 2008 |
$20m |
|
2 |
British Airways |
December 2008 |
$5m |
|
3 |
Air France and KLM |
February 2009 |
$6m |
|
4 |
Cargolux |
February 2009 |
$5m |
|
5 |
Martinair |
February 2009 |
$5m |
|
6 |
Japan Airlines |
April 2011 |
$5m |
|
7 |
Korean Air Lines |
November 2011 |
$5m |
|
8 |
Malaysia Airlines |
May 2012 |
$6m |
|
9 |
Emirates |
October 2012 |
$10m |
|
10 |
Cathay Pacific |
December 2012 |
$11.25m |
|
11 |
Singapore |
December 2012 |
$11.75m |
|
12 |
Thai Airways |
December 2012 |
$7.5m |
Source: ACCC
James
says:Where has this $98.5 million gone? I understand that it is not all in one go, but that is a heck of an amount of $$$ paid to whom? I’m sure it could have paid for a few things around…..
Peter
says:Paid as a fine to the Commonwealth, James, as all commonwealth penalties the money is remitted to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Paul
says:James; Peter Dutton has just spent most of it on lawyers and compensation payouts.
Sunrise Mumbai
says:Despite being classified as dangerous goods, freight of this kind can also be transported by air, benefitting from its speed, although it does require a series of specialised procedures to guarantee that the logistics operation proceeds with no unwanted surprises.