Head in the clouds, feet on the ground: a look at the flight simulator

written by Owen Zupp | October 5, 2019

Warning: Undefined array key "image-size-770" in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310

Warning: Trying to access array offset on null in /data/www/upgrade/australianaviation.com.au/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/australianaviation/functions.php on line 1310

This story first on the role of the flight simulator in pilot training appeared in the August 2019 edition of Australian Aviation.

An early generation flight simulator is the original Link Trainer. (An original Link Trainer. (Shuttleworth Collection)
An early generation flight simulator is the original Link Trainer. (An original Link Trainer. (Shuttleworth Collection)

The power of preparation is a familiar theme in aviation. The hours of work undertaken on the ground can greatly improve the quality of the flight hours that are logged. While there are many aspects of preparation, the flight simulator has evolved over the decades to provide a critical component in the training environment, its use being not only cost-effective but able to prepare pilots for a host of situations that they hopefully will never have to face in the air.

This content is available exclusively to Australian Aviation members.
Login
Become a Member
To continue reading the rest of this article, please login.

or

To unlock all Australian Aviation magazine content and again unlimited access to our daily news and features, become a member today!
A monthly membership is only $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
PRINT
$49.95 for 1 year Become a Member
See benefits
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
PRINT + DIGITAL
$99.95 for 1 year Become a Member
$179.95 for 2 years Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
DIGITAL
$5.99 Monthly Become a Member
$59.95 Annual Become a Member
See benefits
  • Unlimited access to all Australian Aviation digital content
  • Access to the Australian Aviation app
  • Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
  • Access to In Focus reports every month on our website
  • Access to our Behind the Lens photo galleries and other exclusive content
  • Daily news updates via our email bulletin
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member today!

Comments (2)

  • Rick

    says:

    My studies of work on the simulation of flight showed that a high degree of learning/experience transfer can occur from simulators with a low level of simulator fidelity and that rate of learning transfer increases with the degree of fidelity. However, as fidelity increases the cost of the simulator rises exponentially.

  • Rick

    says:

    Studies of pilot workload showed that high levels of workload occurred at take-off, landing and peaked during times of in-flight emergency and the time in between these events as low-level, but necessary, workload.

    Cockpit automation relieved the pilots of significant amounts of workload and thereby reduced the pilot experience at “hands-on” flying. However, when an in-flight emergency occurs the flying skills of the pilots, more than ever, need the accumulated experience of many years of “hands-on” flying.

    The need for extensive hands-on experience was demonstrated in the QF32 event by Captain Richard De Crespigny where his fully laden A380 suffered catastrophic damage shortly after take-off from Singapore. Richard De Crespigny is a highly experienced Captain with wide ranging experience accumulated over many years, and with the support of his crew, he was able to draw on his experience to cope with a potentially impossible situation. The book QF32 is a good coverage of his experience leading up to and including this event.

    De Crespigny’s experience spanned the transition of the ever increasing automation of the cockpit. Because cockpit automation reduces the opportunity for younger pilots to gain his his level of hands-on experience, it reduces their ability to cope with the piloting skills needed to fly a damaged aircraft such as occurred to QF32.

    The aviation industry recognised that the improvements in cockpit automation were reducing the opportunity for pilots to gain the higher skill levels needed cope with in-flight emergencies. To address this need, flight simulators were developed to allow pilots to gain experience in facing a wide range of in-flight emergencies

Comments are closed.

Momentum Media Logo
Most Innovative Company
Copyright © 2007-2025 MOMENTUMMEDIA